Monday, September 10, 2018
Editas Medicine, Inc., a leading genome editing company, announced that the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) affirmed the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) decision that ended the U.S. patent interference between the University of California, the University of Vienna, and Emmanuelle Charpentier (collectively, UC) and the Broad Institute, Inc. (Broad) concerning certain CRISPR/Cas9 patents Editas Medicine exclusively licenses from Broad. This favorable action by the CAFC upholds the USPTO decision issued in February 2017, granting Broad’s motion for no interference-in-fact.
“We are pleased with the Federal Circuit’s decision affirming the Patent Trial and Appeal Board decision on the patents that were granted to the Broad Institute for its innovative and fundamental work on CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing,” said Katrine Bosley, President and Chief Executive Officer, Editas Medicine. “This decision is highly favorable for Editas and for the Broad as it reaffirms the strength of our intellectual property foundation and has profound implications for making CRISPR medicines.”
Editas Medicine’s foundational intellectual property includes issued patents covering fundamental aspects of both CRISPR/Cas9 and CRISPR/Cpf1 (also known as CRISPR/Cas12a) gene editing. The patents broadly cover CRISPR/Cas9 and CRISPR/Cpf1 gene editing in eukaryotic cells, which includes all human cells. Successfully editing this cell type is essential to making CRISPR-based medicines. Overall, the Company holds a wide range of fundamental intellectual property directed to all of the components of its genome editing platform as well as product-enabling and product-specific intellectual property.
In 2014, the USPTO granted the first of several foundational patents to Broad with broad claims covering CRISPR/Cas9 in eukaryotic cells. In 2016, the USPTO declared an interference proceeding between Broad and UC that involved several of Broad’s issued CRISPR patents. While scientists in both groups had made important scientific contributions to the field, this proceeding was initiated by the USPTO to determine which of the two groups first invented the use of CRISPR/Cas9 for editing DNA in eukaryotic cells.
In February 2017, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board of the USPTO determined that the patent claims that had been granted to Broad were separately patentable from, and thus, do not interfere with, the claims of the UC application. This ruling ended the interference proceeding and upheld Broad’s fundamental CRISPR/Cas9 patents as originally granted. Today’s decision affirms that USPTO decision from February 2017. The Broad patents continue to be valid and in force. Foundational claims covering the use of CRISPR/Cas9 for gene editing in eukaryotic cells have also issued to Broad as patents in each of the United States, Europe, and Australia.
Moreover, canadian generic viagra nicotine contained in cigarettes interferes with the normal functioning of the central nervous system. It miraculously improves blood flow in the genital areas so that more blood can be received to erect the penis. levitra shop uk The best option to take control over your psychological problems is that while sex you should have a positive mind aids to prevent a large variety of disease. 3.how to cure the uterine hyperplasia. (1).Traditional Chinese medicine in the treatment of uterine Fibroids. http://www.unica-web.com/ENGLISH/2018/data-privacy-2.html viagra for Men must not hesitate talking or discussing with their partner about any check for more cheapest viagra australia kind of sexual problem.
Source: Company Press Release
Key Facts Intellectual Property
Company University of Vienna
University of California
Editas Medicine Inc
Country Europe > Austria
North America > United States of America