Biotech company revives CRISPR patents at US appeals court

Biotech company revives CRISPR patents at US appeals court

The United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit is seen in Washington, D.C.
The United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit is seen in Washington, D.C., U.S., August 30, 2020. REUTERS/Andrew Kelly/File Photo

(Reuters) – A U.S. appeals court on Friday reversed a U.S. Patent and Trademark Office tribunal’s decision to invalidate five patents related to CRISPR gene-editing technology owned by Danish biotech company SNIPR Biome.

The Patent Trial and Appeal Board had previously found that SNIPR’s patents were invalid based on a challenge from New York-based Rockefeller University. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit overturned the decision based on a 2011 overhaul to U.S. patent law.

SNIPR co-founder Jasper Clube said in a statement that the company was “delighted” with the decision, which “reinforces SNIPR’s extensive intellectual property portfolio.”

Rockefeller University attorney Salvatore Arrigo said the school disagrees with the judgment and is evaluating its options. He said Rockefeller was pleased with some aspects of the decision, including its finding that the university’s application is “prior art” that could potentially be used to cancel SNIPR’s patents in a different proceeding.

SNIPR received the five patents, which cover technology for selectively killing bacteria using CRISPR, in 2016. Rockefeller applied for similar patents starting in February 2013.

Before Congress passed the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act in 2011, the Patent Office would issue patents based on who first came up with an invention. The Patent Trial and Appeal Board used proceedings called interferences to resolve conflicts over who invented first.

The board phased the proceedings out after the AIA altered the system to be based on who applied for the patent first, but it still held some interferences based on patents and applications from before March 2013.

The board canceled SNIPR’s patents in 2021 in an interference proceeding with Rockefeller. But the Federal Circuit agreed with SNIPR on Friday that its patents could not be subjected to the proceeding.

“SNIPR’s pure AIA patents were examined and issued under the AIA’s first-inventor-to-file patentability requirements; they cannot then be cancelled under the different, pre-AIA invention priority requirements,” U.S. Circuit Judge Raymond Chen wrote for a unanimous three-judge panel.

The case is SNIPR Technologies Ltd v. Rockefeller University, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, No. 22-1260.

For SNIPR: Brian Matsui of Morrison Foerster

For Rockefeller: Salvatore Arrigo of Arrigo Lee Guttman & Mouta-Bellum

Our Standards: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles.

Thomson Reuters

Blake Brittain reports on intellectual property law, including patents, trademarks, copyrights and trade secrets, for Reuters Legal. He has previously written for Bloomberg Law and Thomson Reuters Practical Law and practiced as an attorney. Contact: 12029385713

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

+ 12 = 13