Examiner-AI × Applicant-AI — How AI Is Transforming IP Examination

Introduction

Examiner-AI: “Each day, I examine hundreds of applications — patents, trademarks, designs…”

Applicant-AI: “Meanwhile, I help legal teams draft smarter filings, pre-screen trademarks…”

AI is reshaping both sides of the intellectual property (IP) process. From how examiners search for prior art to how applicants prepare and draft, artificial intelligence is no longer optional — it’s essential.

The IP Examination Landscape Is Evolving

• Filing volumes are rising: Record submissions challenge examiners.
• Subjects are complex: Software, biotech, AI-related inventions.
• Applicants demand speed: Delays impact innovation.

How AI Is Helping IP Examiners

1. Faster & Smarter Prior Art Search

• WIPO/USPTO AI retrieves similar patents in seconds.
• USPTO’s “ASAP!” scans documents pre-review.
• JPO/KIPO use AI to extract keywords and citations.

2. Image Recognition for Trademarks & Designs

• DesignVision identifies shape similarities.
• EUIPO’s TMView AI measures logo similarity.

3. Enhanced Classification & Workflow Automation

• WIPO AI automatically classifies IPC codes.
• Automation reduces clerical workload.

How Applicants Use AI to Keep Up

1. Drafting & Filing Smarter

• PatentPal, AllPriorArt, Solve Intelligence enhance claim clarity.
• Design applicants use AI to verify originality.

2. IP Strategy & Risk Analysis

• AI dashboards track performance and conflicts.
• Risk heatmaps reveal vulnerable portfolios.

3. Compliance & Data Privacy

• Platforms like Intanify connect LGPD with IP analytics.
• Systems flag licensing, privacy, and orphan-IP risks.

Key Benefits of AI Integration

Risks and Compliance Challenges

• Bias & Transparency: AI black box models cause inconsistencies.
• Data Privacy: Third-party tools must comply with LGPD.
• Inventorship: AI cannot be listed as an inventor.
• Auditability: IP teams must track AI influence in decisions.

Practical Recommendations

For IP Practitioners

• Use AI, but verify results.
• Teach clients how examiner-AI behaves.

For Compliance Officers

• Audit vendors and data flows.
• Demand transparency and logs.

For IP Offices & Policymakers

• Ensure human oversight in all AI-assisted decisions.
• Evaluate bias and fairness of models regularly.

The Future: AI-to-AI IP Workflows

Imagine a scenario where applicant-AI and examiner-AI systems communicate seamlessly:

• AI drafts a Brazilian patent application.
• Simulates INPI examiner-AI review before filing.
• Predicts risks, oppositions, and licensing opportunities.

This is the ecosystem the MJZanon IP-AI Assisted Tool supports — a strategic bridge between examiner intelligence and applicant foresight.

Conclusion

AI won’t replace IP professionals — but IP professionals who use AI strategically will replace those who don’t.

At MJZanon, we believe the future of IP is augmented, not automated.

→ Ready to align your filings with the future of IP?