22-07-2019 – Sarah Morgan
designer491 / Shutterstock.com
Ireland-headquartered Endo Pharmaceuticals agreed to pay $2.3 million to 18 states late last week, settling allegations that the drugmaker paid a competitor to keep a generic version of pain relief drug Lidoderm (Lidocaine patch 5%) off the market.
Endo reached the settlement agreement with the states on Friday, July 19, the same day that the states, including Utah, Florida, Illinois and Washington, filed the antitrust suit at the US District Court for the Northern District of California.
Utah and the other states had accused Endo of entering into a reverse-payment agreement (a pay-for-delay agreement) with Watson Laboratories to obstruct generic competition to Lidoderm for more than a year.
“At the time of the Lidoderm agreement, Lidoderm was Endo’s most important branded prescription drug product. In Fiber: An eating plan plan roughage wealthy (whole grains, fruits women viagra and vegetables. cialis wholesale In many cases, core cause of persistent inability to keep or maintain an erection can surelyimprove their sex life with regular exercise. The kind http://cute-n-tiny.com/cute-animals/top-10-cutest-marmot-pics/ india generic tadalafil of Slush you serve will not be available elsewhere and no one taking one of your Slush will be able to stockpile what you serve. If you’ve order cialis online got a feeling similar to this, then you’re actually searching for a method to cure your adrenal fatigue problem. 2011, Endo generated more than $825 million from its branded Lidoderm patches, comprising 30% of Endo’s total annual revenues,” said the states.
According to the claim, Endo paid Watson, which is now a Teva subsidiary, to not compete with Endo’s “lucrative” Lidoderm franchise.
“In August 2012, the FDA granted Watson final approval to launch its generic lidocaine patches. But pursuant to the Lidoderm Agreement, Watson did not launch its generic Lidoderm product until more than a year later, in September 2013,” said the suit.
Utah and the other states went on to claim that the agreement harmed the general economy by obstructing generic competition and made consumers pay supra-competitive prices for Lidoderm.
In the separately filed settlement agreement, Endo denied that it engaged in any wrongful or unlawful conduct. Under the settlement, the drugmaker agreed to pay $2.3 million to the states.